Cullerin Range windfarm property sale sign

Do wind turbines reduce the value of nearby properties?

The following is by Mike Barnard, who describes himself as a “Wind turbine tourist, informed amateur and lay advocate”. Mike has set up a series of questions about wind power with well researched, referenced answers on the Quora questions site. You can read the full answer here; we have just reproduced the summary.

Cullerin Range windfarm property sale sign
Land for sale by Cullerin Range windfarm, on the Hume Highway.

Summary:  Four major and statistically reliable studies by different respected and independent organizations in different countries spread over a decade have found no correlation between operating wind turbines and negative property values (two found positive impacts in fact).

  • The prestigious US-based Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found no correlation.
  • The respected UK-based Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors in combination with the Oxford Brookes University found no correlation.
  • The US-based Renewable Energy Policy Project found positive correlations between wind turbines and property value increases.
  • A University of Illinois Masters in Applied Economics thesis found statistical evidence that fear of an impending wind farm affects property values, but that operating wind farms do not, and that property values near operating wind farms increase faster.
  • Fear of wind turbines impact on property values before the wind turbines are erected and shortly afterward seems to have a short-term impact on property values and sales. If so, anti-wind advocacy groups are complicit in this – arguably intentionally — by publicizing and promoting fear of property value impacts.

2 thoughts on “Do wind turbines reduce the value of nearby properties?

  1. Citing “studies” that were sponsored and or paid for by the wind industry is rather like the old studies funded by tobbaco industry concluding that there was no scientific proof that smoking is harmful, wouldn’t you agree?

    Your creidibility would be enhanced if you also cited the truly independent studies, and if you accurately quoted the pro-wind studies, or pointed out their exclusion of nearby data.

    1. LBNL: highly independent, highly respected, world-renowned research facility, multiple Nobel Laureates
      RICS: highly independent, Crown-chartered, highly respected, UK organization
      UofI: independent University researcher, unfunded

      REPP is the only one that this charge remotely applies to, although it wasn’t funded by the wind industry either.

      You are maligning world-class institutions without the faintest idea of what they are.

      Did you actually read either the summary or the referenced article?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s